Weekly Backlog Week 37/2026
**100 billion dollars for an AI company. 18 million euros less for the IT of a capital city. Priorities are indeed a fascinating thing.**
Backlog
Weekly Tech Updates
Our weekly backlogs collect the most important tech news, tools, and trends from the cloud-native world. From Kubernetes updates to security alerts to open-source highlights.
Weekly Backlogs
Stay up to date with our weekly tech updates from the cloud-native world.
50 backlogs
**100 billion dollars for an AI company. 18 million euros less for the IT of a capital city. Priorities are indeed a fascinating thing.**
Sometimes you only realize how dependent you are when something fails. Or is sold. Or suddenly someone else wants access to your data.
German companies increasingly view their reliance on US technology as a risk. However, many do not take any action.
**40 minutes.** That's apparently how long it took for a compromised access to turn into a supply chain attack affecting thousands of organizations. Meanwhile, in Europe, we're still debating how much digital sovereignty is actually embedded in an infrastructure that can hardly function without US tech.
This week in the Weekly Backlog: OpenAI prefers to wait for better market conditions, Bavaria continues to transfer millions to Microsoft despite open-source enthusiasm, and European companies suddenly discover their love for 'America First'—as long as their factory happens to be in Tennessee.
This edition primarily focuses on digital sovereignty—from both a technical and political perspective.
Hugging Face operates the world's largest directory for open-source AI models. Millions of developers and companies use the platform daily.
This week had it all: open databases, open GitHub repositories, open questions about data protection – and a surprisingly large number of organizations suddenly discovering that digital dependencies might not be such a good idea after all.
This week, it becomes clearer than ever that digital sovereignty is no longer an abstract debate. While a US Supreme Court ruling once again questions the stability of transatlantic data agreements and highlights European companies' dependency on US clouds, concrete alternatives are emerging.
This week is about much more than just Cloud and AI: The EU is targeting AWS and Azure, Palantir is once again sparking discussions, and the USA is making it clear that technological supremacy has long been a part of geopolitics. We also take a look at Open Source as a beacon of hope for Europe's digital future and, as usual, gather exciting short news and recommendations.
While outside the asphalt is slowly turning into lava, the tech industry is once again discussing the truly important questions: How sovereign is Europe's cloud? Do we need our own hyperscalers? And why is everything getting more expensive – including computing power?
This week, I repeatedly asked myself whether we in IT are actually solving problems or just swapping the names of the problems.
### The best time to think about digital sovereignty was ten years ago. The second best is after the next Microsoft audit.
Control over data. Control over infrastructure. Control over standards. And the uncomfortable realization that while many organizations talk about digital sovereignty, they still view their key dependencies as inevitable.
This week, Europe's tech debate feels like a reality check after ten years of cloud marketing.
I increasingly feel that Europe confuses digital sovereignty with infrastructure folklore.
Europe has been discussing digital sovereignty for about as long as companies have been "briefly testing" Kubernetes clusters in production.
The German Armed Forces reject Palantir because software is no longer just software. Microsoft begins embedding AI visibly into commit histories, quietly altering one of the most important conventions of open source. Europe is once again discussing digital taxes, despite being deeply entrenched in the very platforms it seeks to limit.
This issue can also be read as follows: Software is no longer just a tool – it is power infrastructure.
We talk about **digital sovereignty** – and simultaneously realize how deeply we are still entangled in dependencies. Whether it's messengers, cloud, or infrastructure: control is lacking exactly where it would be critical.
The same pattern everywhere: Things that were "good enough" for a long time suddenly become real problems. Dependencies that were ignored become political. Security that was postponed becomes urgent. And tools that just worked reveal themselves as quite complex power factors.
Not public, not officially decisive – but close enough to touch the processes that should actually be independent.
AI is suddenly not just innovation, but a cost issue. Digital sovereignty is not just a strategy, but a contradiction within one's own operations. And Open Source is not an ideology, but a question of convenience.
While Germany suddenly wants to build data centers on an industrial scale, Europe continues to debate what "sovereignty" actually means – and the USA casually shows us how quickly security standards can soften when dependencies become too large.